|
|
Land Clearing
|
|
4 March 2005 |
Trans-Territory
gas pipeline will irreversibly damage Top End |
Public comment on EIS closes
today
|
The Environment Centre
of the NT (ECNT) says the proposed trans-Territory pipeline (TTP)
would have major environmental, social and cultural impacts along
its 940 km route from Wadeye to Alcan’s Gove alumina refinery.
|
Speaking at the close of
public comment on the Alcan/Woodside environmental impact assessment
(EIS), ECNT Freshwater Campaigner Dr Gary Scott said the EIS was
a fatally flawed document that left far too many questions unanswered and
failed to show that the project was the best option for supplying gas to
Gove, or of net benefit to the Territory.
|
Some of the major impacts
which ECNT and/or the EIS have identified include:
|
»
|
The 940 km long pipeline will require a permanent
corridor 30 metres wide, and a trench up to 2 metres deep, to
be driven through forests and woodlands, rivers, wetlands and
escarpment country all the way from Wadeye to Gove.
|
»
|
The pipeline route will provide permanent access
for vehicles, people, pollutants, weeds, and feral animals into
remote and relatively pristine environments in such regions as
the south Daly catchment, Arnhem Land and the Arafura ‘swamp’.
The negative environmental, social and cultural impacts of this
new access are likely to be serious and permanent.
|
»
|
It will involve almost 3,000 hectares of native
vegetation clearing.
|
»
|
The pipeline trench will cut across, or in some
cases under, 16 major permanent rivers and streams and across
at least nine wetlands of regional or national significance,
and many other creeks, ponds, marshes, springs and floodplains.
|
»
|
There are major risks during construction and
post-construction of erosion and consequent pollution (sedimentation)
of freshwater streams, rivers and wetlands, with potentially
serious impacts on freshwater ecosystems and fish.
|
»
|
During construction, studies show that thousands
of native reptiles and mammals are likely to be trapped in the
pipeline trench and die.
|
|
These and other serious
impacts are barely addressed in the very inadequate Woodside/Alcan
EIS. The company’s EIS is lacking in key information, detailed
plans, and scientific data, and does not provide any sound basis
upon which government or the public can assess the project, let alone
approve it.
|
ECNT is calling on both
the NT and the Commonwealth governments, both of whom are involved
in the project assessment process, to put a hold on the assessment
process pending a strategic review of the pipeline project, including
less damaging alternatives, and pending the completion by Woodside/Alcan
of a much more thorough and detailed EIS.
|

|
Further comment: Charles Roche 8941 7439
Email: ecnt@octa4.net.au
|
|
Back to top
|
|