Media Releases

Latest Releases

Climate Change

Land Clearing

Marine & Coastal

Mining

Other

Uranium & Nuclear

Mining

Line

Home » Latest Media Releases

» Climate Change » Land Clearing » Marine & Coastal » Mining » Other

Line

» 2005-06 » Archives: 2004 » 2003 » 2002 » 2001 » 2000

11 April 2006

Inflated benefits and hidden costs: Independent economic assessment of McArthur River Mine needed.

The economic benefits and costs associated with the McArthur River mine must be examined publicly and independently, the Environment Centre NT (ECNT) said today.

ECNT’s Freshwater Campaigner, Dr Gary Scott said: “Many emotive claims have been made recently in the media by mine proponents, as well as in NT Parliament by the CLP Opposition, about the economic impacts on the Territory should the river diversion and open cut mine not be approved.

 “However, those same mine supporters never mention that the existing underground McArthur River operation has not contributed any mineral royalties to the NT Government for the last decade, because payment of mineral royalties in the NT is tied to mine profits.

 “Under both the previous owner, MIM Holdings, and the current owner, Xstrata, large costs were assigned to the McArthur River mine which rendered it unprofitable – principally the cost of transporting the lead/zinc concentrate overseas and even the overseas smelting costs[1]

 “The end result of these complex overseas arrangements is that while the companies which own the mine recorded substantial profits (e.g. Xstrata US$1.7 billion profit last year), the mine itself reported losses and paid no royalties to the NT Government.

This has gone on for years and raises many serious questions. “How many millions of dollars in income has been lost to the Territory over the last decade as a result of the failure of the mine to record a profit? It certainly appears that the economic interests of Territorians may have been made subordinate to the interests of mining corporations. 

To make matters worse, the mine has been receiving a subsidy from the NT Government guaranteeing the supply of cheap energy to the mine since it opened in the mid-nineties. 

  “ECNT is calling on the NT Government to publicly disclose how much in subsidies the company has received over the past decade courtesy of the Territory taxpayer. We are also calling for an independent assessment of the issue of non-payment of mineral royalties by the mine.

 “When you add to this the potential liabilities faced by the NT Government should the mine plans go awry, as happened at Mt Todd, then the overall economic costs and risks of this mine paint a very different picture of its contribution to our economy”, concluded Dr Scott.

Line

Further information and comment:
Charles Roche: 8941 7439
Email: ecntdaly@iinet.net.au

[1] MIM’s 2002 Annual Report states: ‘Both the McArthur River and Mt Isa lead-zinc mines are world competitive in terms of on-site operating costs but off-site realisation costs, mainly transport and smelting, represent up to 60% of total production costs (in the case of McArthur River) and are eliminating margins in a low price market’ (p17).

Back to top

 

 

 

About the ECNT » Current Campaigns » What's New » Media Releases
Newsletters » Search/Useful Links » Membership » Contact Us » Home

 

 

 

The Environment Centre of the Northern Territory
3/98 Woods St, Darwin » Postal Address: GPO Box 2120, Darwin 0801 NT
Phone: 08 8981 1984 » Fax: 08 8941 0387 » E-mail: admin@ecnt.org